The Plyna Cost Index
The cost of choosing the wrong provider
A single benchmark, built from our own daily data, for how much a UK sender loses by picking the wrong money-transfer provider — the gap between the best and worst deal, averaged across every remittance corridor we track. The wider it is, the more comparing pays off.
Current index — best vs worst provider
1.67%
across 10 corridors · as of 14 November 2026
On a £1,000 transfer, that's about £16.71 lost by choosing the worst provider instead of the best — before anyone even mentions a fee. On the widest corridor today it's £37.18 (UK → Nigeria).
Index over time
The average best-to-worst gap across corridors, by day.
Where does comparing matter most?
Best-to-worst gap on the latest real snapshot — widest first.
- 🇳🇬UK → Nigeriawidest gap3.72% · £37.18
- 🇰🇪UK → Kenya2.55% · £25.45
- 🇵🇭UK → Philippines2.02% · £20.23
- 🇮🇳UK → India1.75% · £17.53
- 🇯🇲UK → Jamaica1.70% · £16.99
- 🇳🇵UK → Nepal1.27% · £12.70
- 🇧🇩UK → Bangladesh1.27% · £12.70
- 🇬🇭UK → Ghana1.12% · £11.17
- 🇱🇰UK → Sri Lanka0.68% · £6.80
- 🇵🇰UK → Pakistan0.63% · £6.34
How is the index calculated?
- — For every provider we work out the effective rate — fee and FX margin combined — and how far it lands from the real mid-market rate.
- — Within each corridor's latest daily snapshot we take the gap between the best and worst provider, then average that gap across all corridors. Comparing best-to-worst inside one snapshot removes the timing noise a raw rate figure would carry. Bank Estimate is excluded.
- — The index covers UK consumer money-transfer corridors only. Every figure traces back to a dated, real quote — never modelled or estimated.